Posts tagged #photoshop

Droplets in Photoshop CS5

Every photo I upload to Flickr goes through a watermarking process. To do this, I created a watermarking action within Photoshop (started this in the CS3 days). These actions can be 'converted' to so-called droplets. These are 'shortcuts' you can place on e.g. your desktop. Every image you drag onto this droplet gets opened in Photoshop and the preconfigured actions are applied.

This worked in Photoshop CS3, and CS4 (after some modifications to the original action). But in Photoshop CS5 the droplets won't execute. The action itself runs smoothly within Photoshop, but when you export it as a droplet, the action won't start. You have to start the action manually.....

I even tried to create an action / droplet from scratch in Photoshop CS5, but that one won't run either when I drop a JPEG on the droplet. This is a reason for not upgrading to CS5 on my main machine (which also still runs Leopard for compatibility reasons).

According to the online Adobe Photoshop CS5 helpfiles regarding droplets, the droplets should still function. So I write this of as a bug in the initial release of Photoshop CS5.

Posted on May 5, 2010 and filed under Annoying, Photography, Review, Software.

HDR Processing in Adobe Photoshop CS5

The new CS5 edition of Adobe Photoshop has refined the HDR (High Dynamic Range) processing. Now, you won't need the Photomatix plugin (in theory).

After selecting the 'Merge To HDR in Photoshop' option in Lightroom, the images get exported to Photoshop and it starts doing its magic. Normally (in the earlier versions) you would end up with a 32-bit image, but now you have the option of manipulating the 8 or 16-bit version of the image. Just like in Photomatix.

Photoshop CS5 HDR interfaceInitial experiences are not really positive, but that can be related to my experiences with Photomatix. A quick glance at the controls available, it should be able to produce similar results.
Talking of Photomatix; The plugin used in CS4 won't work in CS5. You need to download the CS5 version of the plugin at the HDRSoft.com website (Mac / Windows). The new version is universal (32 and 64-bit), free of charge to registered users, and works only in CS5.

One thing I didn't expect was that Photoshop started downloading a lens database from the Adobe website during the creation of the HDR. No idea if this is used in the HDR creation, or that this is done only once and used in other Photoshop CS5 plugins / filters

Posted on May 4, 2010 and filed under Photography, Review, Software.

First Contact With Adobe Photoshop CS5

As most of you will know, Adobe release its latest Creative Suite (CS5) a couple of days ago. Personally, I only use Photoshop and Dreamweaver. For the casual photographer, the CS2 or CS3 version of Photoshop is probably more than you ever need. So are there reasons for upgrading (or reinstalling)?

First, Adobe doesn't really support the older versions of Photoshop anymore, or the operating system you run at this moment has some issues with an older version. So an upgrade will happen sooner or later. But apart from compatibility issues with the OS, there are some new features available for the (casual) photographer. The following features are the ones I'm most interested in;

  • Easier ways of doing complex selections
    Basically a tedious job in every earlier version, so I have my reservations on this feature.
  • Content Aware Fill
    Create-photos-in-Photoshop-instead-of-by-using-a-camera feature.
  • HDR Imaging
    Let's see if it beats Photomatix Pro.
  • Automatic Lens Correction
    I now use PTLens on the photos that need the correction.
  • 64bit support (!!!!)
    A feature that's long overdue.
  • Better Black and White conversion
    I mostly use Nik Silver Efex Pro at the moment.

In this post I'll be evaluating Photoshop CS5 on some of the points I mentioned above. Others will become a separate blogpost later on. For the moment, I'll be starting with 'upgrading' from CS4 to CS5, and see if that goes well (after I've cloned my MacBook disk with SuperDuper! to make sure I can always go back if things go sour).

Another thing that I need to check out is compatibility with earlier versions of Action scripts, and (older) plugins. Just check the CS5 or Photoshop tag for all the related posts about Photoshop CS5.

Posted on May 4, 2010 and filed under Personal, Review, Software.

Photoshop CS4 and Snow Leopard

Photoshop CS4 was released as an Universal app (system requirements). So both PowerPC (PPC) and Intel support. Since it's an Universal app, you shouldn't need Rosetta on an Intel .
So upgrading to Snow Leopard shouldn't be a problem... Until you're gonna use the droplet functionality of Photoshop CS4. That piece of code still needs Rosetta to function.

So no way that CS4 is Universal. It's just another piece of buggy Adobe software.

What's next? An announcement that this crap won't be supported and that you can upgrade to the >1000USD Adobe CS5 suite next year?

Posted on September 10, 2009 and filed under Annoying, Personal, Software.

To Photoshop (or not)

To Google in the OSX Dictionary To Google in the OSX DictionaryBrandnames turning into verbs is nothing new. Google turned 'verb' a while back officially, and can be found in several dictionaries all over the world. You could think that the brand owner would like it this when a product (or brand) becomes a commodity. Well, not every brand.....

Adobe has a section on the 'Photoshop' usage on their website [mirror]. It seems that photoshopping is a bad verb. Why? I don't know. No matter how good or bad an image or photo is altered or with what tool. The most common remark is 'PHOTOSHOPPED'. All this means is that people associate image manipulation with Adobe Photoshop. There's a reason that this piece of software is on top of the image manipulation food chain. It's simply the best (and probably the most expensive by the way :) ).

After looking for 'google' in the Apple OS X Dictionary, I also tried 'photoshop'. and guess what I found:

to Photoshop in Apple OS X Dictionary to Photoshop in Apple OS X Dictionary/me sits back and wonders when Apple (or even me) receives a letter from an Adobe attorney :) for the incorrect usage of the Photoshop brand.

Posted on August 7, 2009 and filed under Personal.

Nik Software for Adobe Lightroom

A while ago, Nik Software released the Nik Color Efex Pro plugins for Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (or so it seems :) ). Now they also release the awesome B&W filters Silver Efex Pro plugins for Adobe Lightroom v2.3.

No need to open the images in Photoshop for the Black and White conversion process. Just do it from within Lightroom.

Nik Silver Efex Pro 4 Lightroom Nik Silver Efex Pro 4 Lightroom

The new installers (either Silver Efex Pro or Color Efex Pro is nothing more but an small update of the original software with the added support for Lightroom. The update is free for registered users. New users pay $199,00.

Downside (apart from the price for new users) is that the custom templates created under the Photoshop CS version are not directly accessible under the Lightroom version.
Another point of attention is that a new copy is created every time you open the photo in the Lightroom plugin. This copy isn't removed when you press cancel in the Nik plugin. This behaviour was also present in the earlier Lightroom versions when you editted a photo in Photoshop. So I hope that this (bug) will be gone with a new release of the NIK software.

Here is the information supplied with the Color Efex Pro for Lightroom installer (the Silver Efex Pro text is basically the same):

Installation Help for Color Efex ProTM 3.0
For Adobe® Photoshop® Lightroom®
© 2009 Nik Software, Inc.

Installation for Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2

1. Start the installer utility by double clicking on the Color Efex Pro 3.0 Installer file.
2. After you read the Welcome Screen and Read Me and accept the license agreement, the Color Efex Pro 3.0 installer will automatically install into the appropriate location.
3. Click the Continue button.
4. Enter your user name and password and then either select Begin 15 day demo and click on the Demo button or select Enter Product Key and Activate, then enter your name and product key and click on the Activate button.
5. Select whether to automatically register Color Efex Pro 3.0 as an external editor with Lightroom.*
6. Complete the installation.
7. The next time Lightroom is opened, your new software will appear under the Photo > Edit In menu.

Minimum Requirements
Operating System:
• Mac OS X v10.4 or later

Processor:
• Macintosh-PowerPC® G4, G5, Intel CoreTM Solo, Intel Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Xeon®

RAM:
• Minimum: 1 GB

Image Editing Application:
• Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2

*The option to automatically register Color Efex Pro 3.0 as an external editor for Lightroom is only available if Lightroom is detected during installation. Color Efex Pro 3.0 can be manually added as an external editor to Lightroom with the instructions below.

Adding Color Efex Pro 3.0 to Lightroom as an External Editor

1. Open the Preferences in Lightroom.
2. Click the External Editing tab.
3. In the Additional External Editor section select a desired File Format, Color Space, Bit Depth, Resolution, and Compression.**
4. Click on Choose to select an application. Navigate to the location of Color Efex Pro 3.0.
5. Select the Color Efex Pro 3.0 file and click Choose.
6. Under the Preset drop-down menu select Save Current Settings as New Preset... and name the Preset.

**Color Efex Pro 3.0 only supports TIFF files (8-bit or 16-bit) with No compression or LZW compression.

Color Efex Pro 3.0 can then be accessed under the Photo menu as an external editor.

v Color Efex Pro 3.000LRmac

Posted on April 8, 2009 and filed under Photography, Software.

Photoshop CS3 Watermark / Frame Action

Ever since I started uploading photos onto the Internet I needed a way of 'protecting' my images. I could choose to upload a very small photo, with terrible JPEG artifact, but that's not the way you want to be remembered. Especially today. Today we have the bandwidth and the online storage to upload large images, so why not do that.

If you don't want that other people (or companies) to (financially) benefit from your hard work (1, 2, 3), you may want to 'tag' your photos. Just to make sure who created the original image.

When you shoot lot's of photos and share them with others on the Internet, you don't want to manipulate each photo. You would want to automate this.

Thankfully, there are numerous programs out there that can do such a thing. Some are free (free as in speech, and free as in beer), and others are commercially available.

Posted on August 1, 2008 and filed under DRM, Photography, Software, Tips'n Tricks.